Financial markets – The mechanisms of trade
Financial markets are potentially very lucrative. To prove this thesis there are many people who are making great amounts of profit in this market. However, there are several important things that you should bear in mind when making an investment in the financial markets. Price differences are what really counts, not the value and not the price. In order to make money, you only need to be aware of one thing – your selling price needs to be higher than your buying price and your expenses together. Naturally, you will achieve the greater profit in the financial markets, the larger price difference you manage to place. The popular idea “buy low and sell high” is rather misleading, as it leads investors towards looking for lower-priced stocks that have a tendency to move higher, while virtually any stock, bought at any price can potentially move up or down. The price of the stocks in the financial markets therefore shouldn’t serve as criteria in trade selections. Another trade mechanism is that a trend which has once been started tends to keep going. Price changes of a particular direction and size have a long-range dependence. The changes may be persistent, often reinforcing each other. If that is the case, the started trend will continue going. Therefore, when investing, you should look for strong trends followed by large price changes. Also, it may happen that a trend in one direction on the financial markets may reverse itself, as, eventually, any trend comes to an end. These events are not easy to predict if at all, so you should make certain that the stocks you want to buy are still moving in the right direction prior to pulling the trigger.
May 23rd, 2011 at 8:15 pm
even aliens have to work through understandable natural mechanisms. If they don’t, then they’re equivalent to gods.
What would “they don't” look like? How could you tell that they were not using natural mechanisms? I propose that you cannot tell. The most you can say is that you don't know how it works. That is not good enough to ascribe deistic status to the operator, in my opinion. Wouldn't it be more prudent to conclude that they simply understand the nature of the universe or multiverses better than you do?